Archive for September, 2006

CCIE #16755

Congratulations Jim.
Tim Ross CCIE# 11757
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Jim Ferens Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:31 PM To: ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: CCIE #16755
It was a long journey but I finally passed yesterday at RTP. This was my 9th attempt at the lab. The last four attempts I felt confident walking out […]

Comments

Configuring the modem from the router!! (urgently)

Hello guys. Who have some experience with modems?? Sorry that this question is not from the r&s track but from the real life. Well I have to configure for one our large customer the modem from the router. R1-Modem-Internet. It is the wavecom modem. I would devide my question into parts….
1. Wavecom is […]

Comments

NBAR Sqlserver x Custom Protocol

Hi all,
I think that the IEWB Solution Guide isn’t ok about the question 9.1 of Lab 15 - Vol.1. According with table 3 in URL: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122t /122t8/dtnbarad.htm, the nbar protocol “sqlserver” uses the TCP port 1433 and not UDP port 1434.
I understand that the URL (search for “NBAR provides for the creation of a custom […]

Comments

3550 ACL’s ..

Please, Please do *not* use the “it allows me to configure it, then it works” logic. In many many cases IOS does not work that way Sabrina
—– Original Message —- From: 2nd CCIE To: Sam Lai ; sabrina pittarel Cc: security@groupstudy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2006 11:21:50 AM Subject: […]

Comments

3550 ACL’s ..

Hi folks ; thanks for this useful inputs ..i already seen the Docs which is sent by Sabrina …however what confused me was that i found the dynamic keyword of the ACL already available and the switch did not reject the configuration …i agree also that the dyanmic ACL works just as if […]

Comments

3550 port security , need some clarification please

That’s a very good question. What I can tell you for sure is the following: If the other PCs are not connected to that port you should not worry about them. Now if you were using “voice vlan X” for example the answer would have been: Switchport access […]

Comments

3550 port security , need some clarification please

Sidalo , thanks for the clarification, that has helped alot many thanks
Stephen Skinner
_____
From: Sidalo [mailto:sidalo@gmail.com] Sent: 17 September 2006 18:35 To: Skinner, Stephen Cc: Cisco certification Subject: Re: 3550 port security , need some clarification please
*** WARNING : This message originates from the Internet […]

Comments

3550 port security , need some clarification please

hello , they are the Mac address’s of my phone 0001 and pc connected to the phone 00002 cheers
Stephen Skinner
_____
From: sabrina pittarel [mailto:sabri_esame@yahoo.com] Sent: 17 September 2006 18:15 To: Skinner, Stephen; Cisco certification Subject: Re: 3550 port security , need some clarification please
*** WARNING : […]

Comments

BGP confederations

Afternoon Team; my first post, failed my lab in May06 and revising again for attempt 2 - I can’t see this problem in the archives, so here I go:
Situation: I am revising confederations (”confeds”). I have 5 rtrs (A,B,C,2,1) wired in that order connected b2b via serial or Eth VLANs. Each rtr is […]

Comments

3550 port security , need some clarification please

It should be the access vlan but also on the port.
If you have 6 total MACs on the vlan but only 1 of those is on the port you dont need to add all 6, just the one.
Add 2 MAC spots for the phone in addition to the config you would have if the phone […]

Comments

· « Previous entries