CCDE [7:125824]


Nah the CCDE is design based.
scott vermillion wrote: > > > > From what I’ve read (back to that already), this thing is the > beast of all beasts. On one level, it will devalue the CCIE > (now there will be “non-CCDEs need not apply” job reqs, leaving > out even CCIEs). On the other, you can’t expect expert-level > folk to keep their hands on the CLI their whole lives, so > there’s got to be some updward direction to go. Also, as a > design guy, I like the idea of having an expert-level design > track. >
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=125892&t=125824 ————————————————– FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

Category: CCIE Study

Bookmark this post:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

Leave a Comment

Related Post