Hey I’m glad for that!!!!
But once again I’m not the owner of the reasoning here, it is a Pert Explanation, I know he is working for a great Team, InternetworkExperts; sure he will be adding more of this in their excellent WB and CODs (that BTW are very but very great)
Saludos desde Venezuela Victor.-
[…]
Thanks victor. It has defenatly cleared my horizon
—–Original Message—– From: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:cvictor@protokolgroup.com] Sent: 28 July 2006 10:25 To: Hafizur Rahman (UK); ‘pankaj kumar’ Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; ‘Sami’ Subject: RE: RE: dampening
Hi Hafi,
Bro, as I said, this is taken from the archives, is a post made by Petr.
>http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200603/msg00204.html
Now, If you set the MaxST to 120 […]
Hi Hafi,
Bro, as I said, this is taken from the archives, is a post made by Petr. >http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200603/msg00204.html
Now, If you set the MaxST to 120 you will get Max Penalty =1500*2^(120/30) = 24000, and the Maximum Penalty in the router is 20000. try to set that value (120) in the router you will have […]
Hi Victor,
Sorry my math is not very good Could you please give me an example fo this formula MaxPenalty = ReuseV*2^(MaxST/HLife) I just want to know why max time is 100 not 120
Thanks in advance
hafi
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Victor Cappuccio Sent: 28 July 2006 08:50 To: ‘pankaj kumar’ Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; ‘Sami’ […]
Hello Pankaj, this is what Petr explained in his email to the GS It seems that this topic is very attractive, because you have lots of the same threads in the Archives
Saludos, Victor.-
==================================================================== Hi,
hm, let’s see
If we got 1000 for every flap, then for 3 quick flaps in a row, theoretically, we accumulate 3000. […]
Elmer,
Thanks for the link.
I wished the commands associated with shape [shape (class-map) and shape (policy-map class)] would be more similar especially the part concerning the calculation of peak rate.
No mention of peak rate calculation under shape (policy-map class).
peak rate = CIR(1+Be/Bc)
Respectfully,
Jerry Montgomery, CCDP, CCNP, CCDA, & CCNA
—–Original Message—– From: Elmer Hall [mailto:Elmer.Hall@vaci.com] Sent: […]
You can specify two types of traffic shaping; average rate shaping and peak rate shaping. Average rate shaping limits the transmission rate to the committed information rate (CIR). Using the CIR ensures that the average amount of traffic being sent conforms to the rate expected by the network.
Peak rate shaping configures the router to send […]
You can define Be as zero to simplify the math if you want to use shape average also. Shape peak is not widely deployed in user networks.
Chris
On 7/18/06, Montgomery, Jerry wrote: > > Good morning, Kay, > > I see that Chris Lewis had responded. > > I went back and forth trying […]
Good morning, Kay,
I see that Chris Lewis had responded.
I went back and forth trying to understand the difference. The main difference is that “shape peak” will send Bc + Be at every time interval, whereas “shape average” will send Bc every time and possibly Be if credits have been accumulated.
So if you have a […]
Hi,
With Class Based Policing the Bc bucket is replenished every
(T_current - T_old)*Policed_rate/8
If one second has elapsed since the last packet the bucket will fill up.
If the Bc bucket fills up, tokens are captured by the Be bucket assuming it has capacity.
In terms of tokens available within each backet: Traffic within the Bc tokens available, conforms […]