Search Results
December 12, 2008 @ 2:17 am
· Filed under ccna-exams
This group was really helpful…
==To those who are really doing their best: keep it up, exam is really not that hard when you truly study.
==To those who are looking for shortcuts: grow up!!! =) kidding aside, YES I do think you can pass ccna without going through the usual process (If your lucky that is) […]
Permalink
September 11, 2008 @ 10:17 am
· Filed under ccna-exams
I have a Cisco 2500 and a 1900 catalyst switch.
My plan is to connect my Cisco 2500 to a generic Belkin router that connects the rest of the house to the internet and then connect the 1900 switch to the 2500 router.
(internet) –> Belkin54g-wrt –> Cisco2500 –> Catalyst 1900 –> a few pc’s
I’m […]
Permalink
July 2, 2008 @ 3:17 pm
· Filed under ccie
it will do you a lot of good to use pass4sure at least version 3.10 or 3.13
ade adegoke wrote: HI THERE PLS I’LL BE WRITING THE […]
Permalink
July 2, 2008 @ 6:17 am
· Filed under ccna-exams
HI THERE PLS I’LL BE WRITING THE CCNA EXAM 640-802 SO I NEED A TEST KING Q & A PRATICE FOR IT….WANT TO KNOW IF YOU IT’S GONNA WORK FOR MY EXAM?IS TI SURE…Â
Permalink
February 24, 2008 @ 9:17 am
· Filed under Jobs_Network_Cisco_Egypt
Hello everyone and Salam alikom
iam looking for partner specially from Tanta & Delta Cities . iam gonna to open new IT Company. core business will be to deliver Web Applications and some of other services like : web hosting, e-promotions, web design, PC [hardware-software] …
already i have a lot of clients around : […]
Permalink
February 1, 2008 @ 10:17 pm
· Filed under ccna-exams
Congrats, sounds like the direction I am gonna take when I claim my CCNA 640-802 mid month this month.
Kind Regards,
Ronnie
Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox.
__._,_.___
[…]
Permalink
September 15, 2006 @ 2:00 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Tim,
If you check your policy map it process your BIG class. All packet greater that 1251 is a matching criterion then your police action will be applied. So here you are allowing SMTP as well with packets size greater that 1251.
If a packet was sent lower than 1251 size. Of course this is not […]
Permalink
September 15, 2006 @ 12:02 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Tim,
Order matters. Once a match is made, the policy map is no longer parsed. With your commands below, an SMTP packet of length 1300 would match the first class-map. If you wanted to exclude SMTP, you could always use the following:
class-map match-all BIG match not protocol smtp match packet length […]
Permalink
September 14, 2006 @ 7:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Does the order under a policy-map make a difference? For example, I’ve got two class-maps, one match smtp traffic and one match packets that are over 1250 in size.
Under the policy-map, I’m calling each class-map, but how does the router process them? They are not nested, so if an SMTP packet that is 1300 […]
Permalink
August 25, 2006 @ 2:00 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Gob,
Yes, a 3550 would be great. A 3550 will do almost all of the stuff a 3560 will do.
—from a brian dennis post— Below is a list of the features that are supported on the 3560 (c3560-advipservicesk9-mz.12.2-25.SEC.bin) but not on the 3550 (c3550-ipservicesk9-mz.12.2-25.SEC.bin).
CEFv6/dCEFv6 - Cisco Express Forwarding Flex Links IEEE 802.1X Port-Based Authentication […]
Permalink
·
« Previous entries