Search Results
September 11, 2006 @ 4:11 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
hi mathew,
I tried this simulator but its not possible to start more than 10 routers for me…
for me…its ok to test some stuff…like policing, mc, access-lists….but I wouldn’t work with it, when I configure the whole test lab
udo Am Montag, den 11.09.2006, 11:59 +1000 schrieb Mathew Fernando: > Hi Group, > > Does […]
Permalink
September 3, 2006 @ 12:59 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Why did you set the metrics ?
> I just want to make sure I am on track. In this example I am assuming that the ospf routes are being redistributed into eigrp as 200. Not eigrp routes being redistributed into OSPF. Am I correct? > > > router eigrp 200 > […]
Permalink
August 31, 2006 @ 11:01 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Thanks all!
HaDucBinh
Mail: haducbinh@vnpro.org or haducbinh@yahoo.com
Phone: 0908 191 322
—————————————————————————- ——– Vietnamese Professionals (VnPro) 149/1D Ung Van Khiem Street, Ward 25, Binh Thanh District, Ho Chi Minh City. Tel: (08) 5124257 - (08) 5125314 Fax: (08) 5124314 Website: www.chuyenviet.com Support forum: www.vnpro.org.
_____
From: Sohail Bhamani [mailto:sohail@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:12 AM […]
Permalink
August 30, 2006 @ 5:00 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Any host on the reflector port will not have reachability anymore. We normally just put a description on the port labelling it as a refelctor port and then leave it alone.
On 8/30/06, Udo wrote: > > this is also what I understand… but is there any requirement or > restriction for this port […]
Permalink
August 30, 2006 @ 12:01 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
this is also what I understand… but is there any requirement or restriction for this port ? for my appreciation this port should only be configured and it is no more involved in the span process ?! > The reflector port is used to encapsulate the packets before sending them > on to > the […]
Permalink
August 26, 2006 @ 8:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Yeap Sabrina is right
RX(config)#policy-map POLICE1
RX(config-pmap)# class ANY
RX(config-pmap-c)# class class-default
RX(config-pmap-c)# police cir 10000
RX(config-pmap-c-police)#
RX(config-pmap-c-police)#policy-map POLICE2
RX(config-pmap)# class ANY
RX(config-pmap-c)# class class-default
RX(config-pmap-c)# police 10000
RX(config-pmap-c-police)#
RX(config-pmap-c-police)#exit
RX(config-pmap-c)#do show run policy
Building configuration…
Current configuration : 152 bytes
!
policy-map POLICE1
class ANY
class class-default
police cir 10000
policy-map POLICE2
class ANY
class class-default
[…]
Permalink
August 26, 2006 @ 7:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Udo, sorry for the late reply, just catching up with emails after few days of break. In my understanding:
police configures a 1 rate policer. police cir pir configures a 2 rates policer.
when only is specified, both commands: i.e. police or police cir
are identical.
Please look for […]
Permalink
August 25, 2006 @ 1:01 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi,
I’m looking for a german study partner for the R&S Lab. If anyone like to study together..please send an email…
udo
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Permalink
August 24, 2006 @ 9:01 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Can anyone explain what is the usage/scenario to apply per-port per-vlan? What type of switchport that would be benefit when we apply per-port per-vlan?
“Guzman, Chris” Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com 08/21/2006 05:41 AM Please respond to “Guzman, Chris”
To “Udo Konstantin” , “CCIE Groupstudy” cc
Subject RE: Per-Port Per-VLAN marking
The per-port per-VLAN […]
Permalink
August 22, 2006 @ 12:59 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Sameer,
I configured it yesterday in both ways… The result was when I do ’show policy-map’ –> on both I can see cir 128000….?!? > To my understanding both are same command .and using in the QoS polices > to define bandwidth .but i notice if you define police cir xxxxxx bits/s > (its means you […]
Permalink
·
« Previous entries