Search Results
February 15, 2008 @ 7:17 am
· Filed under ccna-exams
Installing Windows XP
After choosing your parts and assembling your build, you may think you’re in the clear.Choosing the right OS and installing it can be a little confusing but we will explain the different options out there, walk you through installing Windows XP, and suggest some applications that will help you get the most […]
Permalink
July 22, 2006 @ 12:59 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
Thanks Alex,
Yes, I have tried it with both the configuration option and it works. Amazingly there is no errors at all. Secondly, In text I couldn’t find an example in which you can determine the Encapsulation Type on FR Switch by turning the debug on. However I did find examples which had sniffer traces explaining […]
Permalink
July 22, 2006 @ 10:59 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Can someone please help on this guys ?
Diagram: R2 (Spoke with fr cisco)——-R1 (hub)——–R3 (spoke with FR IETF)
The Scenario here is that R1 is HUB and R2 & R3 are Spokes If we look at configurations below, the encapsulation type on R2(spoke) is Frame-relay IETF. When we do our configuration on R1 and […]
Permalink
July 21, 2006 @ 12:59 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Diagram: R2 (Spoke with fr cisco)——-R1 (hub)——–R3 (spoke with FR IETF)
The Scenario here is that R1 is HUB and R2 & R3 are Spokes If we look at configurations below, the encapsulation type on R2(spoke) is Frame-relay IETF. The interface encapsulation on FR switch is set to FR-IETF for interface connected to R2. So when […]
Permalink
July 19, 2006 @ 1:04 pm
· Filed under CCIE Study
The ethernet side is likely not your issue. Are there any other Aps in the area (different company perhaps?) or any other device that may cause radio interference? Is your radio channel plan designed well? It may be that you need to go wandering around with a wireless sniffer (YellowJacket or […]
Permalink
July 19, 2006 @ 1:59 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Scott and Victor,
Thanks alot. So the answer is we do not need to say IETF in the satic mapping statement on R1 (hub) pointing to R2 (spoke) which has IETF type, right?
> —– Original Message —– > From: “Scott Morris” > To: “‘Victor Cappuccio’” , “‘Quetta Walla’” , ccielab@groupstudy.com > Subject: RE: frame relay […]
Permalink
July 18, 2006 @ 10:11 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Yes
Rack7R1#show run int s0/0 Building configuration… […]
Permalink
July 18, 2006 @ 10:06 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
And R1’s mapping is with CISCO encap?
—–Original Message—– From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Victor Cappuccio Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:10 AM To: swm@emanon.com; ‘Quetta Walla’; ccielab@groupstudy.com Subject: RE: frame relay encapsulation type
Hi Scott I do not see any problem; Do I’m missing something?
Rack1R3#show frame-relay map […]
Permalink
July 18, 2006 @ 10:03 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi Scott I do not see any problem; Do I’m missing something?
Rack1R3#show frame-relay map […]
Permalink
July 18, 2006 @ 10:01 am
· Filed under CCIE Study
Hi, What I have heard so far is that Cisco Router support both encapsulation type (yes even using the Cisco Default encapsulation at the other end)
So having this topology; R1 ==== FR ==== R3 and R3 is the HUB, using encap frame-relay ietf, and in R1 we use encap frame ietf
As you can see […]
Permalink
·
« Previous entries