setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command
Hi SHanky, The task is to make R1 active without using Priority and preempt hence highest ip address could be used .Thanks ,Kay .
On 6/19/06, Shanky wrote: > > Hi, > > Glad it worked, so the task must have a wording like R1 should be the > active router and not what you mentioned that R1’s priority should be higher > without using ..any commands on any routers. > > Is it? Coz the HSRP election would be won by > 1. Priority > 2. IP address of the I/F. > > So, if you want R1 to be Active for HSRP, either it should have higher > priority or higher IP address. > > Do let me know if the Task clearly says to increase the priority without > using the preemt or priority commands ? or does it say only to ensure R1 is > the active router ? > > Thanks > > Shanky > > > On 6/19/06, jhtemail wrote: > > > > I would suggest HRSP must have a backup condition in case of a tie in > > priority. Maybe something like manipulating the IP Address of the > > interface, > > something like the higher IP Address wins. Someone else may have a > > better > > idea but check your other options there may be a way to tip the balance. > > Could also try playing with the MAC Address setting. Setup HRSP see > > which > > one becomes Active, then see what you need to manipulate to switch it to > > the > > other. For testing reasons use the pre-empt command and when you have > > cracked it take out the pre-empt command and set the system up as > > requested > > in the question. > > > > > > > > —–Original Message—– > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of > > Kay > > D > > Sent: Monday, 19 June 2006 7:00 PM > > To: Shanky > > Cc: Cisco certification > > Subject: Re: setting up HSRP priority w/o priority command > > > > Thanks , we are not supposed to use standy priority nor preempt on > > neither > > routers . > > Any other way out ???? > > > > > > > > On 6/19/06, Shanky wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > If the requirement says ..R1 should have higher priority….without > > using > > > the standby priority command..why not change R2 (The other router on > > the > > > segment) priority to lower (Say 90). This will make R1’s priority > > higher > > > without using the command on R1. > > > > > > > > > Hope it helps > > > > > > Shanky > > > > > > > > > On 6/19/06, Kay D wrote: > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > How do we setup higher HSRP priority on a router without using > > > > > standy priority or preempt . > > > > > > Thanks , > > > Kay D > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > > Subscription information may be found at: > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html > > > > > > Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Subscription information may be found at: > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Category: CCIE Study
